Jump to content

Talk:William Monroe Trotter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWilliam Monroe Trotter has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 1, 2013Good article nomineeListed

Untitled

[edit]

I have undertaken a re-write of the original article for the purpose of spelling and grammar correction, and inclusion of photos, with a view to preserving the spirit of the original.Tonymartin 08:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't their a picture of this William dude??? I need a picture of him. How am I supposed to do a project without a picture?? This bites

(This is the way to request a photo for an article, BTW) Chyel 05:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:William Monroe Trotter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 18:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have a full review up by the end of the day. Dana boomer (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    • Early career, "He was not particularly activist in these years," This sounds off to me...is it a correct use of "activist"?
    • Early career, "The accommodationist policies of Booker T. Washington," Could "accommodationist policies" be linked or briefly explained? While I have a general idea of what this means, many readers (especially those not from the US) will not. I see now that this is explained (and well) in the first paragraph of the Attacking the African-American establishment section. Could this information be moved earlier in the article?
    • NERL, "center of anti-Washington civil rights activity," Is this anti-Washington DC or anti-Booker T Washington? If the latter, were they actually anti-Washington (they actually worked against him) or just not with him (didn't agree with him, etc.)?
    • Other protests, "The united front, worked in combination with the death later in 1915 of Booker T. Washington to bring about a relatively harmonious end" I think the comma is unnecessary here. Also, the grammar of "working in combination with the death..." doesn't quite work. Maybe "This united front, along with the death later in 1915 of Booker T. Washington, brought about a relatively harmonious end..."?
    • The Guardian, "a leading abolitionist agitator of the pre-war era," May want to specify which war.
    I think I've addressed these. (I'm not sure I like how moving the background on accomodationism worked out, may still tweak that.) Magic♪piano 16:35, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I also added references to full name of Booker T. Washington when in doubt - to clarify which of Trotter's arguments were with him and which with the gov't in Washington, DC. Also added more on Washington's lesser known support of NAACP legal challenges to disfranchisement, and the state of disfranchisement at the time - in practice.Parkwells (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    File:James Monroe Trotter.png has an author life+100 tag, when it should (I think?) have a pre-1923 publication tag. We don't know the author, so we don't know his date of death.
    This should be {{PD-1923}}, I have changed it accordingly. Magic♪piano 14:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    File:Du Bois, W. E. B., Boston 1907 summer..jpg - when was this actually published? If it wasn't published, we can't do pre-1923 publication, so it would need a different tag (possible author life +70 if we know who took the picture).
    While I've updated what is known about this image (linked to the provenance page at UMass), its status is sufficiently unclear that I've swapped it for a different one from the Library of Congress. Magic♪piano 14:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    A bit outside your regular time period! Overall very nice - just a few prose issues, one minor ref issue, and a couple of image issues. Let me know if you have any questions, Dana boomer (talk) 20:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I took it on as a challenge of sorts, fallout from working on List of NHLs in MA and List of NHLs in Boston. Getting William Monroe Trotter House to GA may be a bit more of a challenge... Magic♪piano 14:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I think I've addressed your issues; let me know if not. Thanks for reviewing! Magic♪piano 16:35, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, everything looks good, so I'm passing the article to GA status. I worked on the Michigan NHL list last year, taking it up to FL status, and had quite a bit of fun with it. It's cool to see people working on the other state lists, too - maybe one of these days we can make a gigantic featured topic! :) Dana boomer (talk) 16:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Terms

[edit]

African American as a noun is not hyphenated; the term is hyphenated when used as an adjective, as in "African-American writer." part of WP MOS.Parkwells (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Monroe Trotter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]